It doesn't matter what some think it means, because if I think Sharia law is butterflies and gummy bears and rainbows, I am simply wrong. Sharia Law is Sharia Law. Just like the Speeding Law is the Speeding Law. It doesn't change based on what I think it is
Agreed. Pro-murder people are either misinformed or in denial. And I did. You claimed to have no faith, so you fall into either the denial of obvious evidence (Athiesm) or the ignorance of obvious evidence (Agnosticism)
South American countries have always been that since Spanish Revolution, and US has nothing to do with any of those. Vietnam wasn't divided, it was united
[user]14136520[/user] I'm referring to fact that most ''refugees'' fail to integrate in the societies of the countries they end up in (Germany, Sweden).
another retard trying to blame all that is wrong in the world on Europeans and Americans.. (though I won't deny America funded terrorism in the Middle-east)
Because they don't want to integrate, they want to go home. Say your home country started being mean, so you leave behind everything you know to go somewhere safer until things back home calm down. It really doesn't matter if those people welcome you or not, if they do nothing to solve the problem
Idk why nobody understands this. We funding Afghanistan and some other countries who were fighting Russia. We sent weapons and stuff to help them. Years later, it is not our fault that those weapons were taken and used against us
I'd ask what you mean by "evidence", [user]14136520[/user] but that would most probably be the spark to set off a flamewar, and I wouldn't want to make Magi suffer from any more vehement comments under this post
Refugees do not wish to be refugees. It does not matter to them if you welcome them or not, because all they want to do is go home. You welcoming them doesn't change anything. BUT, if we clear up the problems which caused them to be refugees, (ISIS, Taliban, oppressive government, etc) they can go home. In the link above, you can see that actual Syrians agree with me. Just kill the problems (which we can do) an they don't have to be refugees
Grrr gravy I hate you for asking questions :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: lol jk The evidence of intellegent design is everywhere. Nature, the human body, anatomy, microbiology, astronomy, the existsnce of intellegent life, the existsnce of life itself, are all evidences of intellegent design. Every culture since the beginnin of time has had a god or gods, This is because it was evident that someone or something intelligent created everything. Athiesm is mostly a recent belief, that there is no God or gods. And really, the idea of a god has been around since the beginning, and there is no evidence against it, so Athiesm is more of a state of denial than a true belief. But, because of Athiesm, we have Agnosticism. Agnostics are usually 1 of 2 variants. A Thiestic agnostic was once of faith, but was led astray by Athiesm, and now they believe a god exists, however, he is unreachable and unknown, or simply doesn't care. Athiestic agnostics usually come from Athiesm, and see evidence for a creator, OR, do not want to be associated with the close-mindedness of Athiest. Either way, they wish to be seperated from them
So what you are suggesting is that the ultimate solution is to end the war and violence in their countries. I'm pretty sure everyone agrees on that, but it's not as simple as that. If it was, then why wouldn't it have happened already?
[user]14136520[/user] You mentioned that the concept of God has always been a thing until recently, do you not perhaps think that is because of a flaw in human thinking (looking for meaning) and because recently there has been a large development in scientific research which has largely contradicted many old religious statements?
Because our nations are being led by scaredy cat liberals who are frightened their own citizens will be offended. And, if you watch the recent US news, we are doing something. Tomohawk the Syrian bases used to gas citizens, and MOAB the Taliban
I do not think this is human flaw, because the evidence for it is still around. Also, please provide some of this research. And the concept of God is still very much a thing. Some consider it good, others a distant being who forsake us, an some an ideal to be hated just for existing. There is no evidence you can provide to prove the existance of intelligent design incorrect. Consider that a challenge, if you wish