This is not a real suggestion, im just here to comolain about the fact that its not fun to join the attacker team. Its so bad that only the noobs and players who feel bad for the attackers.
http://imgur.com/a/aMrwQ
http://imgur.com/a/aMrwQ
-
Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.
buff the attackers
- Thread starter assassiniv
- Start date
- Status
Why are you using all of these pictures that clearly show that people in the red team have left. We cannot force people to change the team and this has nothing to do with the ratio also. It would also be hard to buff the attacker team if it is this empty.
well not really, you see its so easy that even free to play games know how deal with this.
first write down in the game chat "the teams are unbalanced, switch teams" or something like that and then randomly switch players.
Also, you can see from the begining that players prefer to stay in lobby instand of joining the attcker teams.
from the begining the blue teams have more players, and thats one of the reasons of players not joining the attcker team (i also saw some players join teams that were full).
this thing is killing the new playerbase of EW, new players who join the attcker team (coz they have to) are mostly rage quiting the game and never returns, or perhaps only join the defenders.
kek no, add back troll, buff every player of the attckers with voteable perks like "battle rage" (streanth) or just give them random effects. you can disable those effects after there is a balance between the sides.
P.S. in moria gold there was 6:5 ratio (6 dwarves), after that the orcs who never had a chance to begin with just left the game because they felt useless and angry.
sometimes when a player wants to switch teams to help the attckers he cant because "teams are full" even though they are equal.
Deal with it until Tim fixes it.
I think I'm done with the attacker team untill then.
kek no, add back troll, buff every player of the attckers with voteable perks like "battle rage" (streanth) or just give them random effects. you can disable those effects after there is a balance between the sides.
[/quote]
You clearly have no idea about what balance is. I am going to ignore the comment on voteable perks such as strength like you suggested since there is 1 million and more things wrong with that. As for troll, you have been advocating about how archer is OP and then turn around and suggest "add back troll", which is arguably one of the most broken classes in old EW due to the non-existent skill floor, 1 shot ranged rocks, double the damage of other melee players and triple the health. I am just gonna put it simply, if troll is readded, with archer in its current state there will be NO class in the game which would be able to 1v1 troll on equal footing.
The reason why teams are so massively unbalanced is; A: Map advantage to defense side, B: Archer is worthless in pretty much every situation on the attacking team where as archer is useful on defense team. These two factors combined make attackers much much weaker than defenders and why you see people like me always going on defense so we can actually play the archer class.
thebeserker
New member
kek no, add back troll, buff every player of the attckers with voteable perks like "battle rage" (streanth) or just give them random effects. you can disable those effects after there is a balance between the sides.
[/quote]
if troll is readded, with archer in its current state there will be NO class in the game which would be able to 1v1 troll on equal footing.
[/quote]
Just change hammerer to old hammerer problem sorted.
kek no, add back troll, buff every player of the attckers with voteable perks like "battle rage" (streanth) or just give them random effects. you can disable those effects after there is a balance between the sides.
[/quote]
if troll is readded, with archer in its current state there will be NO class in the game which would be able to 1v1 troll on equal footing.
[/quote]
Just change hammerer to old hammerer problem sorted.[/quote]
Add the old lossarnach axeman*
I would rather not have to put up with the troll class ever again. I hope it never comes back because it was horrifying whenever there were only a couple of people online.
There are so many things wrong, deeply offensive, and plainly racist about what you just said. I will have you know that as a troll I gymmed daily, e.g: squats with 40kg rocks in either hand.
I completely agree, which is why both troll and any classes which are similarly OP (for instance a hammerer in full glory) should be point classes!
There are so many things wrong, deeply offensive, and plainly racist about what you just said. I will have you know that as a troll I gymmed daily, e.g: squats with 40kg rocks in either hand.
[quote user_id="4867771" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Pythonawe/74.png" name="Pythonawe"]
But then again we run into the same problem as v.1. Troll, a non-voter or voter class, is stronger than any single class in the game. The only classes that can are hard counters costs points (assuming these classes would be.) or donor. Not to mention when someone who could actually pvp played troll it was unstoppable and completely broken.
[/quote]
I completely agree, which is why both troll and any classes which are similarly OP (for instance a hammerer in full glory) should be point classes![/quote]
and put a limit on the number of players playing this class
thebeserker
New member
There are so many things wrong, deeply offensive, and plainly racist about what you just said. I will have you know that as a troll I gymmed daily, e.g: squats with 40kg rocks in either hand.
[quote user_id="4867771" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Pythonawe/74.png" name="Pythonawe"]
But then again we run into the same problem as v.1. Troll, a non-voter or voter class, is stronger than any single class in the game. The only classes that can are hard counters costs points (assuming these classes would be.) or donor. Not to mention when someone who could actually pvp played troll it was unstoppable and completely broken.
[/quote]
I completely agree, which is why both troll and any classes which are similarly OP (for instance a hammerer in full glory) should be point classes![/quote]
So we are getting old hammerer cool.
There are so many things wrong, deeply offensive, and plainly racist about what you just said. I will have you know that as a troll I gymmed daily, e.g: squats with 40kg rocks in either hand.
[quote user_id="4867771" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Pythonawe/74.png" name="Pythonawe"]
But then again we run into the same problem as v.1. Troll, a non-voter or voter class, is stronger than any single class in the game. The only classes that can are hard counters costs points (assuming these classes would be.) or donor. Not to mention when someone who could actually pvp played troll it was unstoppable and completely broken.
[/quote]
I completely agree, which is why both troll and any classes which are similarly OP (for instance a hammerer in full glory) should be point classes![/quote]
So we are getting old hammerer cool.[/quote]
Or maybe we keep the voter hammerer, and get the old Longbeard class as a point class. I don't really think it matters, as long as the Dwarves get a voter class to fill it's place.
We, the staff team are discussing this topic intensively atm; we will report back when we have found some solutions.
Like you discuss about push the cart idea?
Like you discuss about push the cart idea?[/quote]
Not quite, we actually tested the cart idea in-game, we haven't tested buffing attackers yet
.0.
Yus :smiley:
Yus :smiley:
Plus mind to wait with the discussion because there is another thing I want to post but I can't do this from my phone.
I assume that is also why you double posted?
hush now my pink pikman
- Status