Amount times a class has been bought so far
Berserker Class - 31
Halberd Class - 27
Mage Class - 22
Ranger Class - 21
Medic Class - 8
Everyone donates for ranger? It's the second least bought class...
-
Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.
Ranger
- Thread starter cha0z
- Start date
- Status
Amount times a class has been bought so far
Berserker Class - 31
Halberd Class - 27
Mage Class - 22
Ranger Class - 21
Medic Class - 8
Everyone donates for ranger? It's the second least bought class...
Gundabad1
New member
Amount times a class has been bought so far
Berserker Class - 31
Halberd Class - 27
Mage Class - 22
Ranger Class - 21
Medic Class - 8
Everyone donates for ranger? It's the second least bought class...[/quote]
Not even my point but sure.
1. You can avoid Ranger-class opponents.
2. You can stop trying to solo classes that you believe to be stronger than you and go in with your team instead, it's cheap but at least you have a significantly better chance of survival if you're bad at 1v1s
3. Find it's weaknesses and use every advantage.
2. You can stop trying to solo classes that you believe to be stronger than you and go in with your team instead, it's cheap but at least you have a significantly better chance of survival if you're bad at 1v1s
3. Find it's weaknesses and use every advantage.
(You are just very stupid if you want chase ranger :wink: )
SO I SEE 2 UNSKILLED KIDS CRYING BCS THEY CANT KILL SOMEONE BETTER THAN THEM AND THEY BLAME CLASS BCS THEY ARE TOO FCK STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THEY ARE 0 thats what i think stfu[/quote]
If you won't chase the ranger he would simply go to somewhere where he can bow spam you.
It seems someone here very like ranger and his speed and it's the the same guy who LOVE the defender team, class who can escape easily and ranged class.
You like it coz when someone can finely beat you for whatever reason you just escape using your speed as a berserker/mage/ranger.
Plus I think that being respectful is one of the laws here in EW and it's so important that I got mute by calling someone noob.
Man i am trying to knock to your stupid head that classes like soldier, archer , sperman in 98% are better than berserker(berserker if is using to killsteal and assasinate and have gold helmet is a bit better than soldier in xd), ranger , mage but how its 1 vs 1
soldier vs berserker - i would pick soldier bcs sometimes he needs less hits to kill berserk than he need to kill us
me vs me would be 55% win for soldier
archer vs ranger - i would pick ofc archer , cuz it deals 6 dmg per shot ( so i need 2 not fully charged shots to kill)
me vs me would be 70% for archer (ranger have to come closer to volley )
mage vs spearman - mage is class made for 1 vs 1 so its bad example , but in teamfights and on walls spearman is way better (with mage you have to stay away and just shot fireballs) But i didnt see good mage in game ( and mage is only good on attackers team so its - )
me vs me -i bet 90 % for my mage.. it depends how good someone is with mage
assassiniv vs assassiniv - i bet he would win with spearman
The main reason why am i playing donor classes is fact they are safer NOT better and WAY more fun to play.
soldier vs berserker - i would pick soldier bcs sometimes he needs less hits to kill berserk than he need to kill us
me vs me would be 55% win for soldier
archer vs ranger - i would pick ofc archer , cuz it deals 6 dmg per shot ( so i need 2 not fully charged shots to kill)
me vs me would be 70% for archer (ranger have to come closer to volley )
mage vs spearman - mage is class made for 1 vs 1 so its bad example , but in teamfights and on walls spearman is way better (with mage you have to stay away and just shot fireballs) But i didnt see good mage in game ( and mage is only good on attackers team so its - )
me vs me -i bet 90 % for my mage.. it depends how good someone is with mage
assassiniv vs assassiniv - i bet he would win with spearman
The main reason why am i playing donor classes is fact they are safer NOT better and WAY more fun to play.
Gundabad1
New member
[quote name="miho47dwa"]Man i am trying to knock to your stupid head that classes like soldier, archer , sperman in 98% are better than berserker(berserker if is using to killsteal and assasinate and have gold helmet is a bit better than soldier in xd), ranger , mage but how its 1 vs 1
soldier vs berserker - i would pick soldier bcs sometimes he needs less hits to kill berserk than he need to kill us
me vs me would be 55% win for soldier
archer vs ranger - i would pick ofc archer , cuz it deals 6 dmg per shot ( so i need 2 not fully charged shots to kill)
me vs me would be 70% for archer (ranger have to come closer to volley )
mage vs spearman - mage is class made for 1 vs 1 so its bad example , but in teamfights and on walls spearman is way better (with mage you have to stay away and just shot fireballs) But i didnt see good mage in game ( and mage is only good on attackers team so its - )
me vs me -i bet 90 % for my mage.. it depends how good someone is with mage
assassiniv vs assassiniv - i bet he would win with spearman
The main reason why am i playing donor classes is fact they are safer NOT better and WAY more fun to play.[/quote]
Oh please, donor cladded absolutely break regular classes. If you really think otherwise just so a class wont get nerfed i'd suggest keeping that Dick out of your arse and calm down because there is no way in hell, that ranger 4 shoots Archer. I myself have no problem at all dealing with the class, but we need to look to certain people that struggle heavily against it. If its getting that much hate because of its OPness then I think its time to nerf it a little.
soldier vs berserker - i would pick soldier bcs sometimes he needs less hits to kill berserk than he need to kill us
me vs me would be 55% win for soldier
archer vs ranger - i would pick ofc archer , cuz it deals 6 dmg per shot ( so i need 2 not fully charged shots to kill)
me vs me would be 70% for archer (ranger have to come closer to volley )
mage vs spearman - mage is class made for 1 vs 1 so its bad example , but in teamfights and on walls spearman is way better (with mage you have to stay away and just shot fireballs) But i didnt see good mage in game ( and mage is only good on attackers team so its - )
me vs me -i bet 90 % for my mage.. it depends how good someone is with mage
assassiniv vs assassiniv - i bet he would win with spearman
The main reason why am i playing donor classes is fact they are safer NOT better and WAY more fun to play.[/quote]
Oh please, donor cladded absolutely break regular classes. If you really think otherwise just so a class wont get nerfed i'd suggest keeping that Dick out of your arse and calm down because there is no way in hell, that ranger 4 shoots Archer. I myself have no problem at all dealing with the class, but we need to look to certain people that struggle heavily against it. If its getting that much hate because of its OPness then I think its time to nerf it a little.
Thank you
I dont want to start any flame discussions either.
I am seeing total salt from both sides of this argument and it's getting nowhere. A lock may be needed.
[quote user_id="7040062" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Rikumaru/74.png" name="Rikumaru"]Not only this but shieldman just recently got a buff (1 armor putting it in line with higher melee dmg classes and spearman).[/quote]
No, this was a bug fix, the class was always meant to have leather pants.
- Status