Also, we would see the creation of shariah law zones where islamic law takes over and police are unable to control the situation, no-go zones. This has happened in Europe in many places but with 802 million people it would be much worse here if we did this.
And many if not most migrants would be unable to support the social welfare system and it would break very fast, and drain the wealth of america, we would be unable to stop the deficit from increasing, we would never be able to afford the infrastructure again, we would lose our military might, and become vulnerable to a nuclear highjacking, and we could see civil wars erupt, the breakup of the Union, the creation of third world countries, the collapse of the federal government causing widespread chaos and unemployment, we would be inundated with new diseases with uncontrolled migration. It would be hell. And the government would start stripping away our rights. And implementing socialism to pay for the welfare system would cause businesses to flee to avoid high taxes.
And we could also see famine and widespread poverty and massive slums develop, filled with epidemics, terrorists, thugs, drug lords, shariah law, just a hellhole. And it would destroy our natural environment.
The UK can benefit from small scale immigration from around the world including Europe and elsewhere, but 686,000 every year is way too much for the country the handle and is very irresponsible and dangerous. This is the reason for the decline in IQ and standard of living, and increase in taxes, security costs, unemployment, poverty, crime, terrorism, extremism, and hiv/aids. On top of that, after 12,000 years of indigenous Britons who inhabiting the land, built the country, its language and culture, and it’s contributions to the modern world, the country is becoming unrecognizable.
Sweden has among the worlds best social welfare system already in place, and an advanced economy and wealth. And a semi socialist system. But with the influx of 2.1 million third world migrants, with lesser skills and qualifications, and from vastly different cultures than indigenous Swedes, the country is at a breaking point. They have 56 no-go zones, a sex crime epidemic, skyrocketing crime, and the inability to pay for housing for migrants anymore. The most generous country in the world’s welfare is broken. They have evicted natives from state housing to make room for migrants (which is ethnic cleansing by definition) and raised taxes. Security costs have skyrocketed as terrorist attacks have hit them as well and innocent people have died. Over 10,000 cars were firebombed by rioting migrants in Malmo. Over 250,000 entered in 2015. Sweden is now going to pay for failed (unqualified, which must be pretty bad since it’s Sweden) asylum seekers back to the country of origin. 80,000 people. Taxpayers have to pay for that or deal with 80,000 more illegal immigrants straining the system, potentially involved in crime or even terrorism (they were rejected by the most generous country after all...).
First, the US can take a lot more people. No way is it nearly full, and opening borders & abolishing security would allow a lot of empty land to be populated with people. Immigrants are often extremely driven people, or they would not travel hundreds of miles with little hope of success. Far better they just be legal in the first place, and thus contribute taxes etc. Furthermore, without social security there would be no system to abuse. Second, the US is bigger than China, has a larger % of available land, and a fraction of the population. You can sure cope with a few decades of unrestricted immigration. Third, the idea that the world is more unsafe now due to Jihadists & Mexicans is bizarre. In the past, the US coped with far more threatening Mexicans than you have now. And as in the past, people want to move to the US not to destroy it, but to benefit themselves and the nation. It's the land of the American Dream, and people want to realise that dream, in the main, not destroy it. Yes, there will be some bad eggs. But there always were. "Armies of Jihadists" would not be rising up. You overestimate a) How many jihadists there are and b) How much they want to come and live in the US. Fourth, and this is the major issue you missed, *there would be no social welfare system to destroy*. "And many if not most migrants would be unable to support the social welfare system and it would break very fast". Literally half my point was that the welfare system would have to be removed for this to work, going back to pre-FDR. This invalidates a lot of your points I'm afraid. Fifth, can you link me to the evidence that a) Shows a link between immigration and IQ in the UK, b) the link between immigration and standard of living in the UK, c) the other points of that ilk: "poverty, crime, terrorism, extremism, and hiv/aids". Sixth, terror attacks in the UK and western Europe have declined markedly over the past few decades. The greatest terror threat in Britain - the Irish - has now subsided. We are fa
For generations, nobody, or few really cared about that. ‘why would people chose to be that way? Its a mental illness. It’s nasty immoral people, its satan blah blah.’ Almost nobody understood them, tolerated them, or was willing to. Hence many people were unnecessarily made miserable. Hence the political and cultural movement for awareness and acceptance in modern times. It is no surprise that many of these people and those who support their (LGBTs) acceptance as people, are brainwashed by idealogical social constructs, like identifying as liberal, and having prejudice against people that disagree in various ways on different issues and are usually self identified conservatives, or centrist. Conservative and Liberal ideology are delusional concepts. But everyone has personal feelings and opinions. I, personally have a few major problems with leftist ideology in present time. But in abstract, they are not real concepts and hence are flawed systems of belief.
Quote from the end of your post: “The greatest terror threat in Britain - the Irish - has now subsided. We are fa”. It looks like enjin cut you off.
G
Guest
Finding different ways to teach kids, that's how. And you don't need a month to celebrate the fact that you are different, that isn't going to change anything lmfao
Oh sad. Basically, I said that islamic immigration has not produced anywhere near as much of a threat as the Irish menace. I then concluded, I believe, by noting that you missed by point about removing social security, then said: "In conclusion, the US should return to how it existed between 1776 and 1920. Low taxes. Minimal government. Unlimited immigration. No social security."
There are many ways to teach kids, how to eliminate the teaching of leftism in schools, is another story. Conservatives and liberals are fighting a culture war and because schools are brainwashing the younger generation into leftism, they are winning.
‘Finding new ways to teach kids’, who is going to change the way they teach young people? The far-leftist professors? Private Universities build a culture of leftism that starts from the top. You expect the President to sign an executive order that says that universities can no longer show political bias? That’ll be called unconstitutional at best, even if it would be better.