no
-
Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.
Nicknames
- Thread starter De_Mik
- Start date
- Status
thebeserker
New member
Hmm I see no need for this personal attack however if you truly believe that
- A: All I do is comment " no" and nothing else I emplore you to actually look at other suggestions I have commented on.
- B: Never give valid reasons, here is the most obvious reason. Its too easy to abuse. IE. Miho gets angry at riku, miho nicks himself Rikumaru, miho(now nicked as rik) starts swearing at loads of people, people report and Rikumaru is punished. Sorry for having to use you guys as examples Rikumaru and miho47dwa.
- C: Too stupid? Please provide proof as to how I am too stupid.
- D: I have made plenty of suggestions both as threads (you could have actually checked the list of suggestion threads) and as in game suggestions.
- E: I have no perms to actually deny any thread. Alongside this, I only put the word no on threads that really won't launch due to being easily abusable.
Ah, this is a personal attack?
I have seen you reply, "no", on multiple threads. It's really not up to you. I don't care what you think, you're not the deciding factor here. Neither am I, but I do not pretend to be.
If you have ANY idea of how nicknames work, you will know that it does not allow you to set your name to another person's IGN.
Yes, you are very stupid. A half-assed answer like that isn't a great depiction of intelligence.
Easily abusable? How are berserker boots easily abusable?
I won't fuck off. You need to depict a valid reason of why you don't like the idea.
Again, you cannot /nick yourself to another person's IGN. If you've been on ANY other server you would know that.
I have seen you reply, "no", on multiple threads. It's really not up to you. I don't care what you think, you're not the deciding factor here. Neither am I, but I do not pretend to be.
If you have ANY idea of how nicknames work, you will know that it does not allow you to set your name to another person's IGN.
Yes, you are very stupid. A half-assed answer like that isn't a great depiction of intelligence.
Easily abusable? How are berserker boots easily abusable?
I won't fuck off. You need to depict a valid reason of why you don't like the idea.
Again, you cannot /nick yourself to another person's IGN. If you've been on ANY other server you would know that.
Yes, it is.
He states his opinion -> you claim you don't care about his opinion -> yet you complain about him stating his opinion. Seemingly this lacks logic.
This again is a personal attack. Oh, and arguing about something you claim to not care about also isn't a 'great depiction of intelligence'.
Really not related to the point you were trying to make in the first place. And not even slightly sensical.
So basically everybody has to write a three part essay on why they don't like the idea just because you or any other suggestion maker can't take no as an answer?
Specious arguments like these aren't a 'great depiction of intelligence' too by the way.
So basically the answer is..
no
Oh no,
I care about his opinion as long as he doesn't shit it out of his ass.
It really isn't a personal attack. A personal attack is criticizing someone for a personal matter. This is not. The matter at hand is a suggestion thread, of which he clearly does not have the wits to write a decent reply to.
He has one major thing wrong. And that's how the plugin works.
It won't allow you to nick after someone else' IGN.
Not only does he give no reason to the, "no", but when he DOES give a reason it's an invalid one.
I care about his opinion as long as he doesn't shit it out of his ass.
It really isn't a personal attack. A personal attack is criticizing someone for a personal matter. This is not. The matter at hand is a suggestion thread, of which he clearly does not have the wits to write a decent reply to.
He has one major thing wrong. And that's how the plugin works.
It won't allow you to nick after someone else' IGN.
Not only does he give no reason to the, "no", but when he DOES give a reason it's an invalid one.
Why did this turn into an argument D:
Because when 2 people have different opinions, they argue to decide in a civiled way which of the opinion is right and which one is wrong.
(The other options include: threats, violence, cursing, telling the other person to shut up because butthurt or ignoring the other side)
K i understand it went with the second option :/
Cant we delete this thread?
No.
[highlight=#d113ee]No and deal with it[/highlight] Edit: Now fuck that I use to be ''Not being rude'' but coming back to this. I'dd say fuck right off.
Ladies and gentlemen, we found our new Lazeekat! [user avatar="https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.enjin.com/187965/site_logo/small.png" name="none"]14410457[/user]
(message of Zer0)
If you have a problem with someone's reply, do not start an argument on that same thread. First of all, if you have a problem, PM that person. Second of all, you all went off-topic which is also against the rules. (just like this argument)
I will not say I agree with you, but I will say that this argument is as useless as it can be. It seems like you are trying to pick a fight with others for your own pleasure. Go do that somewhere else, it is not appreciated here.
(message of Zer0)
If you have a problem with someone's reply, do not start an argument on that same thread. First of all, if you have a problem, PM that person. Second of all, you all went off-topic which is also against the rules. (just like this argument)
I will not say I agree with you, but I will say that this argument is as useless as it can be. It seems like you are trying to pick a fight with others for your own pleasure. Go do that somewhere else, it is not appreciated here.
Furthermore, I'll lock this thread to make sure it doesn't escalate into a flamewar.
And as for the topic itself, I really don't think it'll be added, simply because it's unnecessairy and it'll only cause confusion.
*locked*
Just to add something to this.
Both Zer0 and thebeserker were wrong.
Zer0 shouldn't start personally attacking thebeserker, and could have asked him more nicely to state why he doesn't like the idea. On the other hand, thebeserker shouldn't go posting "no" without explanation. It doesn't help the thread in any way and only pisses the maker of the thread off.
So, please learn from your mistakes and prevent this kind of confrontations in the future.
Both Zer0 and thebeserker were wrong.
Zer0 shouldn't start personally attacking thebeserker, and could have asked him more nicely to state why he doesn't like the idea. On the other hand, thebeserker shouldn't go posting "no" without explanation. It doesn't help the thread in any way and only pisses the maker of the thread off.
So, please learn from your mistakes and prevent this kind of confrontations in the future.
- Status