• Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.

Empublican vs. Empocrat

Status
Not open for further replies.
ThuBioNerd

ThuBioNerd

New member
V1 Veteran
(Inspired by Republican vs. Democrat lists; note I am not personally either Dem. or Rep., though I lean more toward Democratic beliefs, but your EW-an/at standing doesn't have to be the same as your Dem/Rep.)

Roleplay: Empublicans usually go in for roleplay, while many Empocrats stay out of it.
Anrza: Both sides usually agree with his ban.
Antzorg: Empublicans tend to disagree with his ban, while a lesser number of Empocrats do.
Kingjoseph1st: Empublicans often agree with his ban, Empocrats at a far greater number number.
Staff: Empocrats often want more staff, Empublicans tend to just want active existing staff.
Donors: Empocrats tend to have more donors.
Activeness: Empublicans are usually more active than Empocrats.
CookieSmurf: Both sides agree Cookie is a boss.

So which are you? Empublican or Empocrat? Tell us now and get a free pin! Not really but I'm curious.
 
Definitely Democrat wanted Nazgul nerfed,
Republican, more quick to shell out.
Democrat: it's Bushes fault that Nazgul got Nerfed
 
i don't really like democratics. they want to have more stuff like health care etc. which increases taxes and then small companies can't survive. then there are less competitors for large companies which makes them not have to worry about there prices cuz where else you gonna get it at? and where else you gonna work at?.
 
No, most Democrats think - and this is what pisses Republicans off - that the rich people should be taxed more. And why not? If I'm sitting on 5 million dollars, shouldn't I be taxed more than the guy with 10,000? Currently I believe my dad pays as much money in taxes as the millionaires whose lawns he makes nice.
 
ThuBioNerd said:
No, most Democrats think - and this is what pisses Republicans off - that the rich people should be taxed more. And why not? If I'm sitting on 5 million dollars, shouldn't I be taxed more than the guy with 10,000? Currently I believe my dad pays as much money in taxes as the millionaires whose lawns he makes nice.
Click to expand...
yes. but rich people/business owners don't think "oh i get taxed more better pay some of my 1230192380192 million dollars to tax" they think "huh higher taxes lets dump these taxes on the workers working for us." and tax new companies to death. because they are companies they obviously have tons of money to spare - not when they are new. ending up in what i explained in my last post. not to mention the gov does not follow there own health care rules. they don't pay for workers insurance. so yes. it would be nice if the guy sitting on 123180238120 billion dollars got taxed more since they have more money but that is not what happens. plus rich people can always get a citizen ship in another country so they claim to both countries they pay there taxes to the other. then save the amount they would be paying in taxes for retirement. lol
 
For the last thing, couldn't they do that anyway? And on the first thing, you can't give other people taxes.... As for the second, no new business wouldn't, the millionaire who sits on his ass all day watching my dad mow his lawn while they smoke and eat little sandwiches would.
 
I guess I didn't make myself clear when I said taxing rich people. I meant taxing rich people, not taxing rich businesses.
 
But, let me add something here (Republican)
Say you have 10,000 dollars, and you get taxed 100 a month
While the Rich guy has 1,000,000 dollars and gets taxed 1,000 a month.
Now, Say he pays you 2,000 a month, and his taxes get raised to 2,000.
He would say, "huh. Losing money here, why don't I lower my employee's pay."
He lowers their pay by 500.. But let's look at this for all Rich people. Profit is love, Profit is life, Am I correct?
So if they do get their taxes raised, they will lower their worker's salaries in order to make profit, as the raised taxes will make them lose money, rather than gain money.. Get what I am looking at?
 
But still, you would get my example right? I do agree with you on Minimum wage, it should be raised, but not for illegal immigrants, the fact that they got here illegally should mean that they don't apply to the laws of this country as they are not a Citizen, Of course they should still follow the laws, common sense, but not all laws should give them equality, as they are too lazy to fill out some damn paperwork.. I mean YOUR TRANSLATORS ARE RIGHT THERE.
 
Oh good we get something we both agree on. F*ck the illegal immigrants. I honestly couldn't care less if their country sucks and they don't have enough money to come here. There are enough unemployed CITIZENS here without illegal people taking their place. Why don't they keep going to Canada, where they have too much land for their population.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top