• Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.

New Trailer for the 3rd Hobbit

Before Making The Hobbit Movies
<Corporate Guy> Mr.Jackson, plans have changed. We are now doing
3 Movies instead of 2.
<Peter Jackson> But the book just doesn't have that much detail and lore to make 3 movies,
its already a struggle to make 2 movies let alone 3.
<Corporate Guy> Are you forgetting the 2 Billion dollars Mr.Jackson? Make up characters
add inaccurate lore I don't care just get it done.
<Peter Jackson> Yes my lord
<Corporate Guy> Also a 4 legged dragon? That won't do, only put two legs
and giant wing arms
 
Before Making The Hobbit Movies
<Corporate Guy> Mr.Jackson, plans have changed. We are now doing
3 Movies instead of 2.
<Peter Jackson> But the book just doesn't have that much detail and lore to make 3 movies,
its already a struggle to make 2 movies let alone 3.
<Corporate Guy> Are you forgetting the 2 Billion dollars Mr.Jackson? Make up characters
add inaccurate lore I don't care just get it done.
<Peter Jackson> Yes my lord
<Corporate Guy> Also a 4 legged dragon? That won't do, only put two legs
and giant wing arms

And then Bio wished the morons would realize that the original Hobbit would make a really lame movie.
 
[quote user_id="2490487" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/bubbaberet/74.png" name="bubbaberet"]Before Making The Hobbit Movies
<Corporate Guy> Mr.Jackson, plans have changed. We are now doing
3 Movies instead of 2.
<Peter Jackson> But the book just doesn't have that much detail and lore to make 3 movies,
its already a struggle to make 2 movies let alone 3.
<Corporate Guy> Are you forgetting the 2 Billion dollars Mr.Jackson? Make up characters
add inaccurate lore I don't care just get it done.
<Peter Jackson> Yes my lord
<Corporate Guy> Also a 4 legged dragon? That won't do, only put two legs
and giant wing arms

And then Bio wished the morons would realize that the original Hobbit would make a really lame movie.[/quote]
ya it would just be a bunch of fat dwarves running around eraidor with a hairless midget, sure sounds like a great move!
 
I'm getting so sick of the hate.

Making it more movies = more watching material.
It has absolutely no downside for the viewers, and I think the movies are WAY better than the books.
The books have almost no action until they get to the mountain, which'd mean no one likes movie 1 & 2, so no one watches movie 3. The changes made to Kili and the including of Tauriel also made it a lot better imo.

And for those whining about CGI, this CGI looks almost indistinguishable from normal recording, and did you expect them to hire 10.000 Dwarf Actors and teach them how to ride war goats? No? Thought so.
 
Hobbit is an amazing book, but as a BOOK. I doubt any of you chumps could make a better movie than this, so suck it up and enjoy the awesome. (Also TibTib gotta disagree with you on Kili and Tauriel because we all know -spoiler- so I assume either a) Tauriel dies or b) gets with Legolas which sucks. Not to mention it's the old forbidden love we're different races how we gonna make this work crap.)
 
Hobbit is an amazing book, but as a BOOK. I doubt any of you chumps could make a better movie than this, so suck it up and enjoy the awesome. (Also TibTib gotta disagree with you on Kili and Tauriel because we all know -spoiler- so I assume either a) Tauriel dies or b) gets with Legolas which sucks. Not to mention it's the old forbidden love we're different races how we gonna make this work crap.)
It does add a bridge between the Dwarves and Elves, and have you ever imagined Tauriel just ending in sadness, not death or with Legolas?

If you're in love and that person dies it doesn't mean you go into a relationship with the next person who likes you.
 
The only things I don't like about the Hobbit? Tauriel's dialogues (horrible and stupid) and the CGI that 1) made characters like Azog look like an action figure 2) make creatures and places look like a cartoon movie.
 
The only things I don't like about the Hobbit? Tauriel's dialogues (horrible and stupid) and the CGI that 1) made characters like Azog look like an action figure 2) make creatures and places look like a cartoon movie.
So you expect them to build a real lonely mountain and a real Goblin Town?
Azog was huge, had an iron arm/hook and many scars, he would never had worked as non-CGI.
 
[quote user_id="3751908" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/ThuBioNerd/74.png" name="ThuBioNerd"]Hobbit is an amazing book, but as a BOOK. I doubt any of you chumps could make a better movie than this, so suck it up and enjoy the awesome. (Also TibTib gotta disagree with you on Kili and Tauriel because we all know -spoiler- so I assume either a) Tauriel dies or b) gets with Legolas which sucks. Not to mention it's the old forbidden love we're different races how we gonna make this work crap.)
It does add a bridge between the Dwarves and Elves, and have you ever imagined Tauriel just ending in sadness, not death or with Legolas?

If you're in love and that person dies it doesn't mean you go into a relationship with the next person who likes you.[/quote]

She's an Elf. Elves live thousands of years.
 
The only thing I don't like about the new Hobbit trilogy is the excessive use of CGI and generally stupid action sequences. The fight in Goblin Town was completely fine in my opinion, but the barrel scene in The Desolation of Smaug made me facepalm for hours - it was horribly improbable and comical in such a way that it was almost impossible to watch. Hopefully this film's battle scenes will be better!
 
Back
Top