Naz taxis are fun. I like to call them "nazivators". Problem is that people LOVE to attack them, but don't realize that they'll be getting 1 point.
-
Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.
Stop hating on NazGul...
- Thread starter stormray73
- Start date
Naz taxis are fun. I like to call them "nazivators". Problem is that people LOVE to attack them, but don't realize that they'll be getting 1 point.
stormray73
New member
They can try to attack you mean...
In Minas once, I carried a guy all over the place. Tons of fun to do stuff like that, you just have to find someone who won't try to kill you. Keeg once was helping a guy climb up the tower in Morgul from the outside. Unfortunately, getting to the very top is extremely hard because the last stretch is the longest, and hard to carry someone all the way up.
stormray73
New member
In Minas once, I carried a guy all over the place. Tons of fun to do stuff like that, you just have to find someone who won't try to kill you. Keeg once was helping a guy climb up the tower in Morgul from the outside. Unfortunately, getting to the very top is extremely hard because the last stretch is the longest, and hard to carry someone all the way up.[/quote]
Go to the left of the towers and then carry them to the wall.... less chance of them dying.
There are currently 2 nazgul players that can get that high, me and EnderNicky[/quote][quote user_id="6858712" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/fj333/74.png" name="fj333"]WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE nazgul made players rage quit, but be serious a 80 killstreak is op, and gives gondor no chance
erm NO, I have got that alot, but got tired of it and partyant got it this morning and he bought nazgul yesterday ._.
dont forget viktor miho etccccc
cancer_du_ciel
New member
Look, let's be honest. Nazgul is OP. That's why you bought it. I think making it so Nazguls can't be MVP would make things more fair, since you can get a lot of points as a Nazgul anyways. Same with Balrog, it is overpowered compared to even the other point classes. Should we remove Nazgul? No. Do we even need a nerf to the Nazguls abilities? No. But a Gondor soldier to Nazgul ratio would help a lot. I have been on when there was like 6 people on Gondor, and 3 Nazgul. Maybe there could only be a Nazgul for every 15 Gondor soldiers, so that the area isn't swarmed with Nazgul.
I have never seen it when there are >10 Gondorians, and 3+ active Nazgul. Usually when there are that few Gondorians, either some of the Nazgul don't partake in the battle, or die as naz and just be a soldier. Most Nazgul are nice people.
stormray73
New member
I with aj on this one. Nazgul players aren't usually out their to be cruel... I usually just troll gondor (especially on morgul) because I can. If it feels like we're swarming, sorry, but that's sometimes how it is.
I have the same opinion as you. I just want to say, that some people do not read the rules for NazGûl (No entrances smaller than 3x3, etc.) The NazGûl is a class like all others. Yes, it can fly around, but it has few hitpoints and is not very strong in attacking. If a NazGûl sticks to the rules it is strong, but not overpowered.
Lagy_Paladin/Andrew
New member
what if we just made it so nazguls could not get score from capturing flags.
there is what 6 flags? on minas turith. so your score if mordor was wining would be 60 higher than the nazgul's one.
unless he suicided and played normal but flag probably is captured by then
that is one big fat lie. i was on when there were 6 nazgul (2 of them died very fast) and you were one of them. your team was 6 nazgul 3 archers and gondor had 10 players.
there is what 6 flags? on minas turith. so your score if mordor was wining would be 60 higher than the nazgul's one.
unless he suicided and played normal but flag probably is captured by then
I have never seen it when there are >10 Gondorians, and 3+ active Nazgul. Usually when there are that few Gondorians, either some of the Nazgul don't partake in the battle, or die as naz and just be a soldier. Most Nazgul are nice people.[/quote]
that is one big fat lie. i was on when there were 6 nazgul (2 of them died very fast) and you were one of them. your team was 6 nazgul 3 archers and gondor had 10 players.
Gondor team when round begins: 10 people
Mordor team when round begin: 15 people
*Two Nazguls Join.*
Gondor team by end of match: 3 people
Mordor team by end of match: 15-20 people.
Mordor team when round begin: 15 people
*Two Nazguls Join.*
Gondor team by end of match: 3 people
Mordor team by end of match: 15-20 people.
stormray73
New member
I defend that when that happens, I die, I join gondor.
I have never seen it when there are >10 Gondorians, and 3+ active Nazgul. Usually when there are that few Gondorians, either some of the Nazgul don't partake in the battle, or die as naz and just be a soldier. Most Nazgul are nice people.[/quote]what if we just made it so nazguls could not get score from capturing flags.
there is what 6 flags? on minas turith. so your score if mordor was wining would be 60 higher than the nazgul's one.
unless he suicided and played normal but flag probably is captured by then
[quote user_id="10733867" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Ajroets/74.png" name="Ajroets"][quote user_id="2347162" avatar="https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.enjin.com/187965/site_logo/medium.png" name="cancer_du_ciel"]Look, let's be honest. Nazgul is OP. That's why you bought it. I think making it so Nazguls can't be MVP would make things more fair, since you can get a lot of points as a Nazgul anyways. Same with Balrog, it is overpowered compared to even the other point classes. Should we remove Nazgul? No. Do we even need a nerf to the Nazguls abilities? No. But a Gondor soldier to Nazgul ratio would help a lot. I have been on when there was like 6 people on Gondor, and 3 Nazgul. Maybe there could only be a Nazgul for every 15 Gondor soldiers, so that the area isn't swarmed with Nazgul.
that is one big fat lie. i was on when there were 6 nazgul (2 of them died very fast) and you were one of them. your team was 6 nazgul 3 archers and gondor had 10 players.[/quote]
I'm sorry, but I don't recall this moment at all. I doubt at that time I would've been doing anything. Mainly because the other Nazgul would be killing everyone.
[quote user_id="8402473" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/stormray73/74.png" name="stormray73"]I defend that when that happens, I die, I join gondor.[/quote]
I did that once, and when I switched to Gondor, multiple people on Mordor left and Gondor had more players than Mordor. Great timing on my part.
Lagy_Paladin/Andrew
New member
I did that once, and when I switched to Gondor, multiple people on Mordor left and Gondor had more players than Mordor. Great timing on my part.[/quote]
i remember that. then i called you a traitor
I did that once, and when I switched to Gondor, multiple people on Mordor left and Gondor had more players than Mordor. Great timing on my part.[/quote]
i remember that. then i called you a traitor
[/quote]I seem to have crappy timing when joining teams like that. It really sucks.
As I once said, it's too easy for Naz-gul to sustain damage, even when they play a bit risky.
That event may have happened, I just don't remember it. In most cases, not all, if there are 2 Nazgul and 5 Gondorians, at least one Nazgul will not partake in the fighting, or not try to hard. It's mostly because with that many people, there aren't enough Gondorians for them to do much to. Even though it may happen, I'm not on all the time, most times I've seen that doesn't happen.
1 Nazgul for 15-20 is ridiculous, because then you would never be able to get all 9 on at once, because even if people do their join and quit thing and all donators join Gondor, there would only by 3 Nazgul MAX ever. Some number smaller like 5 maybe. Even 10 too high, because if somehow the server is full, and there are 50 Gondorians on (which is pretty much impossible due to team ratio) only 5 Nazgul would be on at a time, even though it would be perfectly fine for 9 to be on.