• Make sure to read the forum rules before creating a new thread or commenting on someone else's thread. The forum rules can be read on this page.

USA Vs Europe Host

True, we want all players to stay on the same server and EU servers are much better since i think the mojority of players are in EU
 
That'd reduce the amount of players on by 50%.
no there is a way to have 2 different servers 1 in UK 1 in USA and have them show and have the same players big server networks have 2 ip's 1 for UK people 1 for USA people and 2 deferent server but it has the same players when you get on the only deference is no lag for everyone
 
[quote user_id="960266" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/sjoerdtim/74.png" name="sjoerdtim"]That'd reduce the amount of players on by 50%.
no there is a way to have 2 different servers 1 in UK 1 in USA and have them show and have the same players big server networks have 2 ip's 1 for UK people 1 for USA people and 2 deferent server but it has the same players when you get on the only deference is no lag for everyone[/quote]

And what is the whole point of that? If you have lag rdecude your render distance
 
[quote user_id="4289752" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Lagy_Paladin/74.png" name="Lagy_Paladin"][quote user_id="960266" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/sjoerdtim/74.png" name="sjoerdtim"]That'd reduce the amount of players on by 50%.
no there is a way to have 2 different servers 1 in UK 1 in USA and have them show and have the same players big server networks have 2 ip's 1 for UK people 1 for USA people and 2 deferent server but it has the same players when you get on the only deference is no lag for everyone[/quote]

And what is the whole point of that? If you have lag rdecude your render distance[/quote]
its not like I lag its like I have 3 second delay on chat hiting other players shooting arrows
:/ just tried reducing my render distance still got 3 second delay
 
[quote user_id="960266" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/sjoerdtim/74.png" name="sjoerdtim"]That'd reduce the amount of players on by 50%.
no there is a way to have 2 different servers 1 in UK 1 in USA and have them show and have the same players big server networks have 2 ip's 1 for UK people 1 for USA people and 2 deferent server but it has the same players when you get on the only deference is no lag for everyone[/quote]
You know,that a server in the US would also take money.
 
hm true but it would only have to be half as big since 50%-%20 would be on it so all you would have to do is downgrade the UK server and spend it on a little USA or just next time you upgrade spend it on a little USA server so everyone wont lag and I can kill md
 
hm true but it would only have to be half as big since 50%-%20 would be on it so all you would have to do is downgrade the UK server and spend it on a little USA or just next time you upgrade spend it on a little USA server so everyone wont lag and I can kill md
Even without lag you can't kill md because he doesn't have any lag either.
 
[quote user_id="4289752" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Lagy_Paladin/74.png" name="Lagy_Paladin"]hm true but it would only have to be half as big since 50%-%20 would be on it so all you would have to do is downgrade the UK server and spend it on a little USA or just next time you upgrade spend it on a little USA server so everyone wont lag and I can kill md
Even without lag you can't kill md because he doesn't have any lag either.[/quote]
we don't know that because one of us lags at all times I think it would be a close match
if there were 2 servers connected like the
mineplex network (not advertising) with 2 ips 2 servers but the same players when Iook at its EU ping its 165 ms when I look at
its US ip its 40 ms but when I get on it has all the same players wether from UK or USA therefore reducing the ms
to:
30-60 ms for USA. and 30+ ms for EU
instead of:
US: 20-50ms for US, 170+ms for EU

EU: ±120ms for US, 12+ms for EU

but I am not in charge so I cant decide anything I can just argue
 
[quote user_id="4289752" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Lagy_Paladin/74.png" name="Lagy_Paladin"][quote user_id="960266" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/sjoerdtim/74.png" name="sjoerdtim"]That'd reduce the amount of players on by 50%.
no there is a way to have 2 different servers 1 in UK 1 in USA and have them show and have the same players big server networks have 2 ip's 1 for UK people 1 for USA people and 2 deferent server but it has the same players when you get on the only deference is no lag for everyone[/quote]
You know,that a server in the US would also take money.[/quote]

That's what I was gonna say
 
Just saying staff.... don't mind me... im just an over analytical American kid but.... America has a higher rate of obesity than Europe could ever dream of (yes i know this sounds not relevant at all but bear with me). This is a terrible thing but what are those kids doing with their time? watching tv, video games and yes minecraft. This means that on a completely LOGIC (i have no idea what the outcomes of a poll would be) there are more Americans playing minecraft than Europeans. This means that there is a larger market for donations and advertisement amongst Americans. Another point is that America, more than anywhere else in the world has access to the LATEST technology... don't get me wrong... i love europe more than America but in my opinion Americans have a much better access channel to cheaper technology than anywhere else in the world because we're almost all fat consumers... anyways Americans on average who have the time to play MC probably have enough money to spare that time for enjoyment instead of working. This means that there is a large market for donations. Thanks you can yell at me if you want but im just providing a basic logical opinion
 
After WW1 Europe came the their allies. America for help to rebuild
Same for WW2 They came to America for help.
The US only ''helped'' because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and Nazi Germany declared war on the US( meaning that the US was drawn to the war against your will) otherwise you would have just sat there and left Europe to it's doom.
 
[quote user_id="3800268" avatar="https://cravatar.eu/helmavatar/Electric_Ice777/74.png" name="Electric_Ice777"]After WW1 Europe came the their allies. America for help to rebuild
Same for WW2 They came to America for help.
The US only ''helped'' because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and Nazi Germany declared war on the US( meaning that the US was drawn to the war against your will) otherwise you would have just sat there and left Europe to it's doom.[/quote]

I seem to remember that after WW2 the Americans devised Marshall aid (USA being one of the few countries to come out of the war richer then when they went in). Marshall aid was in effect a loan. The Americans lent the UK (as well as other countries) a large amount of money for rebuilding on so on. However the main reason the USA lent the money was so the British government could afford to maintain the large army that was required during the war, so they could keep troops in places like Greece. The USA at the time was afraid that countries hit by the war would turn communist due to the financial hardship, if there wasn't a military presence. So in effect the USA lent out money so other countries could do the will of the USA government (which at the time was to reduce communism) regardless of the countries own political stance.

Also one reason the USA didn't join the war until Pearl Harbor was that the US Government had an isolationist approach to foreign affairs at the time. Meaning that what happened outside there own country was not there problem, they were responsible for their own citizens and no other.
 
On a more serious note, if WW2 didn't happen America would be worse off, the amount of income from arms then loans after the war have greatly increase the gross income of America (UK just finished paying off that loan in the past 10 years)

Reliable source says 2011.
 
I am going to say, even though I prefer Europe, one thing that Barack Obama once said, "Osama Bin Laden is dead." :P
 
On an even more serious note... stop talking about WW2 like it was something won... no one won..... MILLIONS of innocent people were SLAUGHTERED!!!!! not a funny thing so if you would stop bringing WW2 into this it would be much appreciated. Also MD_K47 i'm appalled that you would think that WW2 was a good thing... although weapons may have increased in sales, weapons are the WORST thing in the world. Although I'm against the slaughtering of millions of people including but not limited to children women old young. I'd like to remind you all also that guns are the worst thing to ever happen to this world and especially for America. I'd like to pay my respects to all the children and innocent people who have died in these past years due to angry people expressing their feelings by taking guns and MURDERING innocent people with the worst being Sandyhook. Although i'm probably more troubled by these recent events (I live really close to newtown) we all are and it will scare our future as united people.
 
Back
Top